Lowering the voting age is a ridiculous idea - Metro.

Should The Voting Age Be Lowered To 16? No because. Where to draw the line? The line has to be drawn somewhere. If the voting age was reduced to 16, could we then expect to hear cries for allowing 14-year-olds the vote? 18 is the age when an individual becomes an adult, and in a vast majority of democracies across the world, it is the age when an individual may vote at elections. It is.

Should the Voting Age be Lowered? From the Reform Act of 1832, which granted rich male landowners the vote for the first time, to The Equal Franchise Act 1928 which allowed women to vote at the age of 21 regardless of whether or not they owned property, the voting system in Britain has changed and reformed dramatically over the last 200 years.

This topic looks at the case for lowering the voting age to 16, but the arguments below could be used for a debate about a different voting age (perhaps 14?). Another issue to consider is whether the same age should be used for all kinds of voting (e.g. local elections, state elections, national elections, referenda). And should young people.

The question of if the federal government should or should not lower the voting age is a question debated surely around the dinner tables of families in Canada, as well as in the ranks of the government. Some people even suggest that the age needs to be raised. What would make people want the voting age to be lowered to an even lower age than the young adult age of 18. On the other hand how.

By Barney Stephenson In 1969, Harold Wilson’s Labour government lowered the voting age from 21 to 18. Fifty years on, some believe the time has come to lower the voting age to 16. The idea is not a new one. It was first rejected by Parliament back in 1999 and again in 2005. But in 2014, 16- and 17-year-olds were.

There is a proposition going on and age wanting to change the policy on voting age qualifications. There are many discussions about this because people say there to young should not vote because they haven’t fully matured or some argue that they should because voting represents a voice. Three arguments for the policy. B. The truth is that.

If the voting age is lowered again, the age of consent would likely be lowered in other areas as well. That could mean the military draft age could be lowered, criminal responsibility ages would be lowered, and sexual contact consent could be lowered. The pros and cons of lowering the voting age offer several benefits and come with several.

Many people opposed the change of voting age, but others believed that it should be lowered. People who think that the voting age should stay the same usually are the conservative people who want to keep the old customs as they are. People who are conservative are usually cautious about changes, and usually want to stay put without improvement.

Should the voting age be lowered to 16? Essay Sample. This question has been debated nationwide during these past years. A fundamental element in the success of a democratic society is the willingness of the people to be self-governing.

I do not think we should lower the voting age for a few reasons. The first reason is because many younger kids do not have enough of an understanding of politics. We are not taught much of government and politics until the upper grades of high school, and the majority of kids do not watch the news and political debates on TV. Very few middle.

Essay Should The Voting Age Be Lowered? Should the voting age be lowered to 16 years old or stay at 18 years old? There is a movement in progress currently that is attempting to get the voting age lowered from age 18 to age 16. They are a group who call themselves “Generation Citizens” and have named this movement “VOTE16USA”. They.

They should be able to vote. In America there’s always a lot of talk about how 16 years olds are too young and immature to vote. “Since the national voting age was lowered to 18 in 1971, the voting rate among 18-to-24 years old has dropped fairly steadily.